AI revenue systems for B2B teams with complex sales cycles.

Built inside the deals you are trying to win right now.

You are at the right place if you are dealing with the following:

Your best deals go quiet, and nobody can tell you why.

You bought the AI tools. The AI trainings, but still don’t see material impact to margins.

Two people close everything. Nobody can explain what they do differently.

Your last 4 hires took 8 months to ramp, and 2 of them never did.

Less than half your team hits quota, and it’s been that way for 2 years.

The root cause

Point AI at an inconsistent process and it will scale the inconsistency. Every problem above starts before the AI touches anything. Five gaps in the process. AI makes each one bigger.

  • 1What each sales stage means, and what has to be true to leave it
  • 2One view of an active deal, assembled from wherever the truth lives
  • 3One agreed measure of whether a deal is healthy
  • 4One owner for each handoff
  • 5Guardrails for what people, process, data, and AI are each allowed to do

Is this you?

$50K+

Typical deal size. Below that, the system costs more than it returns.

2+ months

Sales cycle. Short cycles do not have enough deal to work with.

1 sponsor

A founder, CRO, or COO who owns the revenue outcome and will sponsor the work.

We are the wrong fit for a short-cycle motion, a company without a usable pipeline, a team with no executive sponsor, or a buyer who mainly wants a tool. If that is you, we will say so on the first call rather than the fourth.

We start inside your live deals

Real opportunities with real money on them. Live deals tell the truth faster than interviews and dashboards do, and they let us be useful in week one. Here is what runs inside the tools your team already opens.

Every rep walks in as prepared as your best one

Slack · Acme Co workspace
# deal-room· 14 members
A
Deal RoomMonday 7:42 AM

Good morning Marcus. You have 3 calls today. Two need something from you before you dial.

Northwind Logistics · 10:00 AM$180,000 · Technical validation
Loose endPriya raised SOC 2 twice on the Aug 14 call. Nobody followed up. She is the one who signs off.
New sinceTheir CTO posted about a warehouse automation RFP on Thursday. Same budget cycle as yours.
Ask aboutWho owns the security review, and whether it runs alongside procurement or after it.
Halden Group · 2:30 PM$240,000 · Proposal
Heads upYou have been talking to one person for 41 days. Every deal this size you closed last year had 4 contacts by now.
TryAsk Dana who else has to live with this decision. That question moved 3 of your stalled deals last quarter.

The pipeline stops telling you what you want to hear

Opportunity · Halden Group
Halden Group
Proposal · Close date Sep 30 · Owner: Marcus R.
Deal health: at risk
$240K
Amount
41
Days in stage
1
Contacts engaged
12
Days since reply

Why this is flagged

Your rep moved this to Proposal on July 14. Your stage exit criteria require a named economic buyer and a confirmed evaluation date. Neither is here.

Dana is still the only contact. She has not replied in 12 days, and the last 3 deals above $200K that reached day 40 with a single contact all closed lost.

The forecast still counts this at 60 percent.

You hear what buyers said, in their words, every week

Inbox · Voice of the Customer
Voice of the Customer · Week of Aug 17
To: Sarah (CEO) · cc: leadership, marketing, product · 3 calls this week
Northwind Logistics
Priya K., VP Operations
Aug 19 · $180K · Tech validation
Halden Group
Dana M., Director of Rev Ops
Aug 20 · $240K · Proposal
Cortland Health
Ray T., COO
Aug 21 · $310K · Discovery
Pain3 of 3 calls

I closed 40 percent last year and 38 this year, and nobody in this building can tell me what changed.Ray T., COO, Cortland Health

My two best reps do it right. The other six do whatever they did at their last company.Dana M., Director of Rev Ops, Halden Group

Desires2 of 3 calls

I want to open my laptop on Monday and know which three deals need me. That is the whole ask.Ray T., COO, Cortland Health

If a new rep could run the same discovery as Priya by month two, that changes our hiring plan.Dana M., Director of Rev Ops, Halden Group

Tools3 of 3 calls

We have Salesforce, Gong, Outreach, and two things I am pretty sure we still pay for. I could not tell you what any of them changed.Dana M., Director of Rev Ops, Halden Group

Our CRM is a filing cabinet. The reps update it on Friday so their manager stops asking.Priya K., VP Operations, Northwind Logistics

Competitor2 of 3 calls

We are talking to a bigger firm because our board has heard of them. Their pitch was a roadmap, not a plan.Ray T., COO, Cortland Health

Our data team says they could build most of this in a quarter. I do not believe them, but I have to let them try.Priya K., VP Operations, Northwind Logistics

Objections3 of 3 calls

I cannot be the one who brings a new vendor to legal in Q4. Ask me again in January.Dana M., Director of Rev Ops, Halden Group

My team will not adopt one more tool. That is not a maybe, that is a fact.Priya K., VP Operations, Northwind Logistics

The first 30 days

We align your sales process, connect the context around your active deals, and put the first workflows into live opportunities. Three stages.

Define
Days 1 to 10

Write down what your team is currently improvising

Stages and what each one means. Entry and exit criteria. Ownership and handoffs. Deal-health measures. Guardrails for what people, process, data, and AI are each allowed to do.

Connect
Days 8 to 20

Assemble the context required to understand a deal

We work with the stack you own when it is fit for purpose. When changing a tool would materially improve the outcome, we build the business case with you first.

CRMEmail and calendarCalls and transcriptsDocuments and proposalsSlackAccount researchProduct and customer data
Launch
Days 15 to 30

Put it to work in deals you are trying to win this quarter

We pick the first workflows with you, based on revenue impact, feasibility, and adoption risk. Month one proves the system on the problems worth the most, not on every tool you own.

Account researchCall preparationDiscovery insightsPost-call follow-upDeal scoringRisk identificationCRM enrichment

What you have on day 30

  • A documented sales process with agreed stages, exit criteria, ownership, and measures
  • A working view of the context needed to assess any active opportunity
  • Workflows running in live deals on your highest-priority use cases
  • Deal risk and stalled momentum visible before they cost you the deal
  • A prioritized roadmap built on the next constraint the work uncovered

Pick the metric that matters. If it has not moved by day 30, we keep working until it has.

Before day one, we agree with you on the one number that defines progress: win rate, sales velocity, deal progression, risk visibility, or forecast confidence. If that number has not moved by day 30, we do not stop, and you do not pay more, until it has.

Why Allenix

Three choices, and the combination is what separates us from a software vendor, an AI agency, or a traditional consultant.

We begin where revenue is won or lost

Active deals first, value in week one, then the broader system prioritized by what those deals revealed.

Revenue judgment and technical execution in one team

Process design, deal-level judgment, data architecture, and implementation sit with the same people. Nothing is lost handing off from strategy to build.

We stay through adoption

We are not finished when an automation runs. We are finished when your team can use and own the system without us.

Questions founders ask us

We build AI revenue systems for growth-stage B2B companies with complex sales cycles. We align your sales process, connect deal and customer context across the tools you already own, and launch practical intelligence that helps your team catch risk earlier and repeat what works.

The process, context, measures, ownership, and guardrails that make your sales motion repeatable, with AI running inside it. Most companies buy AI tools and bolt them onto an inconsistent process. A revenue system fixes the process first, so the AI improves decisions instead of multiplying activity.

Software gives you capabilities. Consultants give you recommendations. We connect the revenue strategy, operating process, deal context, and technical implementation that make capabilities useful, and we stay through launch, adoption, and handover.

Every engagement starts with a Revenue Assessment: one week, $999, credited in full toward your Foundation if you go ahead. We score your deal data, map where your pipeline leaks, interview your founder and sales leader, and review two recent sales calls. If you move forward, Foundations start at $15,000, scoped to the highest-priority use cases the Assessment surfaces.

An executive sponsor, access to the people and systems involved in active deals, and a small group who can make decisions and test the work. We do not expect your sellers or operators to become the implementation team.

That is usually part of the reason to start. We prioritize what has to be fixed now, what can improve over time, and what should not block useful progress.

Not necessarily. We work inside your current systems when they are fit for purpose, and recommend a change only when there is a clear business case you have weighed.

No. We work alongside sales leadership, sellers, and RevOps. We bring the revenue architecture and technical capacity. You stay in control of your people, workflows, and technology.

You do. We build for your ownership and avoid creating dependence on us. Wherever practical the work lives inside your own tools.

On business movement, not the number of workshops or automations delivered. Usually win rate, sales velocity, deal progression, risk visibility, process adoption, and forecast confidence. We agree the measures with you at the start.

A transactional or short-cycle sales motion. A company without a usable active pipeline. A team with no executive sponsor. A buyer who mainly wants a standalone tool or an outsourced sales team.

Start with a Revenue Assessment

One week. We score your deal data, map where your pipeline leaks from qualified to close, interview your founder and sales leader, and review two recent sales calls. You get the one fix worth the most, and a 30-day plan to make it.

$999
Credited in full toward your Foundation.
One week
Kickoff to report in your hands.
Your data
Your CRM and your calls, not a questionnaire.

This is what lands in your inbox

Revenue Assessment · Acme Co
Revenue Assessment
Acme Co · 142 opportunities reviewed · 2 calls, 2 interviews
41/100
Deal-data quality

Where your pipeline leaks

Qualified120
72% advance
Discovery86
71% advance
Technical validation61
39% advance · biggest leak, 37 deals lost here
Proposal24
38% advance
Closed won9

The one fix worth the most

You lose more deals between technical validation and proposal than anywhere else, and it is not a selling problem. 31 of the 37 deals that died there had no named economic buyer in the record.

Your stage definitions do not require one, so nobody is wrong. Fix the exit criteria, enforce it in the CRM, and the same reps working the same pipeline advance an estimated 14 more deals a year.

Full 30-day plan on page 4.

If you move forward, Foundations start at $15,000, scoped to the highest-priority use cases the Assessment surfaces.

Start your Revenue Assessment

If the fix isn't worth more than $999, the Assessment is free.